PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

MUHAMMAD AMEEN vs State S — 2022 YLR 694 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN

Case information

Citation
2022 YLR 694 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN
Court
Balochistan High Court
Year
2022
Reporter
YLR
Parties
MUHAMMAD AMEEN vs State S
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
S. 9

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

MUHAMMAD AMEEN VS State S. 9(b)---Possession of narcotics---Appreciation of evidence---Prosecution case was that 520 grams of baked charas was recovered from personal possession of the accused---Prosecution, in order to substantiate its case produced and examined four witnesses in all---Record transpired that all the said witnesses were consistent on all material aspects---No distinct discrepancy was noticed to spoil the credibility of their testimony---Said witnesses were subjected to cross-examination by the defence, but their testimony was not shattered---From the evidence, the mode and manner of arrest of accused leading to the recovery of narcotic had been proved---Prosecution evidence was unanimous with regard to the arrest of the accused, place of the occurrence, quantity of the recovered charas and to that extent, the evidence of the prosecution was also inspiring confidence---No proof of enmity with the complainant and the prosecution witnesses had been brought on record---Competence of prosecution witnesses being officials was rightly believed---Accused failed to produce any tangible material to rebut the trustworthy and confidence inspiring evidence of the prosecution witnesses---Circumstances established that the prosecution had successfully proved the guilt of the accused---Appeal against conviction was dismissed accordingly.

Other judgments reported in 2022 YLR

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English