PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary vs Haji SAFAR KHAN Ss — 2022 YLR 794 Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court

Case information

Citation: 2022 YLR 794 Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court
Year: 2022
Reporter: YLR
Parties: PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary vs Haji SAFAR KHAN Ss
Subject matter: Civil
Provisions referred to: S. 4

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary VS Haji SAFAR KHAN Ss. 12 & 25---acquisition of land---Compensation rate, determination at time of award instead of the time of notice---acquisition proceeding was started---Compensation amount was fixed at Rs.16,00,000/- per kanal---Compensation rate was enhanced to Rs.55,00,000/- in 2015---Respondents/applicants received compensation under protest contending that they were entitled to receive the compensation to the tune of enhanced value along with 8% compound interest---Trial Court decreed reference of respondents / applicant--- Validity---admittedly, after issuing notice under S.4 of Land acquisition act, 1894 in 2010, appellants had not taken any steps regarding preparation of the award till 2016---In the meantime appellants had enhanced the said compensation rates---appellants were legally bound to prepare the award according to the market/ potential value of the acquired land during the preparation of award---admittedly, award was prepared in 2016----Compensation rates were revised in 2015---Respondents were entitled to get compensation according to revised rate---appeal was dismissed accordingly.

Other judgments reported in 2022 YLR

2022 YLRN 144 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHMUHAMMAD KHALIQ KHAN VS State "Obligation"---Meaning.
2022 YLR 999 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREAQEEL HUSSAIN VS State Witnesses---Dishonest improvements---Effect--- Improvements once found deliberate and dishonest cast serious doubt on…
2022 YLR 1193 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREMUHAMMAD JAVED VS State Benefit of doubt---Principle---Even a single circumstance creating doubt in a prudent mind was sufficient, benefit t…
2022 YLRN 28 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREAMEER HUSSAIN VS State Benefit of doubt---Principle---If there was a single circumstance which created doubt regarding the prosecution case,…
2022 YLR 2210 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURTSOHAIL AHMAD VS State S. 497---prevention of electronic Crimes Act (XL of 2016), Ss.16, 21 & 24---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 419 & 506---…
2022 YLRN 22 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHABDUL QADIR alias ALI VS State S. 497---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 377 & 34---prevention of electronic Crimes Act (XL of 2016), Ss. 21, 2…

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English