MAHENDAR KUMAR vs State S — 2022 YLR 846 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Case information

Citation: 2022 YLR 846 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH
Court: Sindh High Court
Year: 2022
Reporter: YLR
Parties: MAHENDAR KUMAR vs State S
Subject matter: Criminal
Provisions referred to: S. 497---P; S. 497; Penal Code (XLV of 1860); Anti-Money Laundering Act (VII of 2010)

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

MAHENDAR KUMAR VS State S. 497---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 409, 468, 471, 477-A & 109---Anti-Money Laundering Act (VII of 2010), Ss. 3 & 4---Criminal breach of trust by public servant, forgery for purpose of cheating, using as genuine a forged document, falsification of accounts, abetment, money laundering---Bail, refusal of---Allegations against the accused persons were that they were indulged in operation of benami accounts, money laundering and parallel banking practices---Record, revealed that accused had been specifically nominated in FIR with specific role except co-accused---Complainant and Investigating Officer had no ill will/mala fide with the accused to falsely implicate them in the case---Delay in lodging of FIR had been properly explained---Investigating Officer of the case arrested seven accused persons and from their possession, mobile phones, laptops, cheque books, bank accounts deposit slips, remittance applications forms and other documents were recovered in presence of mashirs, who had no inimical terms with the accused, which prima facie, showed their involvement in the case, which appeared to be serious and heinous in nature and also sabotaged the soft image of the country---None could claim bail as of right in non-bailable offences even though the same did not fall under the prohibitorty clause of S.497, Cr.P.C.---Sufficient material was on record against the accused to connect them in the case which appeared to be serious and heinous in nature---Applications for bail being bereft of merits were dismissed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2022 YLR

2022 YLRN 144 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHMUHAMMAD KHALIQ KHAN VS State "Obligation"---Meaning.
2022 YLR 999 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREAQEEL HUSSAIN VS State Witnesses---Dishonest improvements---Effect--- Improvements once found deliberate and dishonest cast serious doubt on…
2022 YLR 1193 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREMUHAMMAD JAVED VS State Benefit of doubt---Principle---Even a single circumstance creating doubt in a prudent mind was sufficient, benefit t…
2022 YLRN 28 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREAMEER HUSSAIN VS State Benefit of doubt---Principle---If there was a single circumstance which created doubt regarding the prosecution case,…
2022 YLR 2210 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURTSOHAIL AHMAD VS State S. 497---prevention of electronic Crimes Act (XL of 2016), Ss.16, 21 & 24---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 419 & 506---…
2022 YLRN 22 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHABDUL QADIR alias ALI VS State S. 497---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 377 & 34---prevention of electronic Crimes Act (XL of 2016), Ss. 21, 2…

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English