WALI REHMAN vs State Ss — 2022 YLRN 148 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

WALI REHMAN VS State Ss. 9(c) & 36--- Possession of narcotics--- Report of Government Analyst--- Appreciation of evidence---Percentage of narcotics (chemical), non-mentioning of---Effect---Accused was alleged to have been apprehended while driving away 16 kg Acetic Anhydride---Seizing officer had separated samples of Acetic Anhydride through recovery memo.---Representative samples were subject to chemical and instrumental analysis wherein Acetic Anhydride was detected---Report of Chemical Examiner was inconclusive because no known percentage of Acetic Anhydride was given therein---Prosecution case was totally silent in that respect and when a known quantity of some forbidden and illegal item, chemical or contraband was not known then on no count, the culprit charged for its trafficking could be convicted---Appeal was allowed and the impugned judgment was set aside, in circumstances. Head Notes

WALI REHMAN vs State Ss — 2022 YLRN 148 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT

Case information

Judgment text as reported