SAEED AHMAD vs State Ss — 2022 YLRN 172 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

SAEED AHMAD VS State Ss. 302(b), 394 & 34---Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), Art. 22---Qatl-i-amd, voluntarily causing hurt in committing robbery, common intention---Appreciation of evidence---Test identification parade--- Non-joining of witness in the identification proceedings---Effect---Accused were charged for committing murder of the brother of complainant by firing during robbery---One of the witnesses was also shown as an eye-witness as evident from complaint but prosecution was not in a position to tell that why he was not brought to participate in the identification proceedings---Statement of said witness showed that he admitted that he did not join the identification parade and at the same time he maintained that he identified the accused at the place of occurrence and thereafter he had seen them at police station---Non-participation of said witness in identification proceedings and his statement that he had seen the accused persons in the police station had made the case of prosecution doubtful---Circumstances established that the prosecution had not been able to prove its case against the accused beyond reasonable doubt---Appeal against conviction was allowed, in circumstances.

SAEED AHMAD vs State Ss — 2022 YLRN 172 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Judgment text as reported