SAEED AHMAD vs State Ss — 2022 YLRN 172 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

SAEED AHMAD VS State Ss. 302(b), 394 & 34---Qatl-i-amd, voluntarily causing hurt in committing robbery, common intention---Appreciation of evidence---Improvements made by witness in his statement---Scope---Accused were charged for committing murder of the brother of complainant by firing during robbery---Occurrence took place at 9.40 p.m.---Complainant did not mention in the complaint even by imagination that when the occurrence took place there was any source of light at crime scene---However, it was first time, when the witnesses in court improved their version by maintaining that there were heavy lights near the crime scene and because of that reason they were able to notice and conceive the features of accused persons---Witnesses were duly confronted from their earlier statements and they were found under improvements---Circumstances established that the prosecution had not been able to prove its case against the accused beyond reasonable doubt---Appeal against conviction was allowed and accused were acquitted by setting aside convictions and sentences recorded by the Trial Court.

SAEED AHMAD vs State Ss — 2022 YLRN 172 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Judgment text as reported