MUHAMMAD TAYYAB vs The VICE-CHANCELLOR/CHAIRMAN ADMISSION COMMITTEE (BUMHS) Prospectus

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

MUHAMMAD TAYYAB VS The VICE-CHANCELLOR/CHAIRMAN ADMISSION COMMITTEE (BUMHS) Prospectus---Scope---Petitioner assai-led the provisions of prospectus which stipulated that if a candidate had been once admitted to any other professional institution against the government reserved seat, he would not be eligible to seek admission in the University---Validity---Referred provision of the prospectus was quite clear and was indeed unequivocal---Purpose behind the referred provision was to put a check upon the person who got admission in one professional institute and start studying there and later on applied for admission in another professional institute---Petitioner had failed to point out as to how the provisions of the prospectus were violative of the Constitution---Constitutional petition was dismissed. Head NotesCase Description

MUHAMMAD TAYYAB vs The VICE-CHANCELLOR/CHAIRMAN ADMISSION COMMITTEE (BUMHS) Prospectus — 2022 YLRN 60 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN

Case information

Judgment text as reported