JALAL UD DIN vs State Ss — 2022 YLRN 68 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

JALAL UD DIN VS State Ss. 302 & 34---Qatl-i-amd, common intention---Appreciation of evidence---Benefit of doubt---Call data of cell phone was not on record---Effect---Accused was charged that he and co-accused committed murder of brother of the complainant by firing---Record showed that in the retracted judicial confession, accused stated that the deceased telephoned him, whereafter they proceeded in a vehicle---Investigating Officer failed to collect Call Data Report (CDR) of deceased and accused from the concerned Company---No investigation was made to trace out numbers registered in the name of deceased and accused---Even the report was not exhaustive---Even otherwise neither the mobile phone was recovered from the accused nor mobile phone of deceased was taken into possession through memos---In absence of any incriminating evidence it could not be held that the deceased had made any phone call to the accused---Appeal against conviction was allowed, in circumstances. Head NotesCase Description

JALAL UD DIN vs State Ss — 2022 YLRN 68 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN

Case information

Judgment text as reported