JALAL UD DIN vs State Ss — 2022 YLRN 68 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

JALAL UD DIN VS State Ss. 302 & 34---appreciation of evidence---Benefit of doubt---Recovery of crime weapon on the disclosure of accused---Scope---accused was charged that he and co-accused committed murder of brother of the complainant by firing---Prosecution had alleged that on the disclosure of accused, the crime weapon was recovered, but the recovery witness stated that they went to the house of accused on 5th July 2018 and on next day Tehsildar called him and got signed the memo---Recovery, in circumstances, was not effected in presence of recovery witness---Even otherwise the recovery of crime weapon could only be a piece of supporting evidence---Mere recovery was no ground to hold the accused guilty of commission of offence---Report of arms Expert revealed that the empties and crime weapon sent together to arms Expert---Such was inconsequential for the prosecution case---appeal against conviction was allowed, in circumstances. Head NotesCase Description

JALAL UD DIN vs State Ss — 2022 YLRN 68 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN

Case information

Judgment text as reported