Citation Name: 2023 CLC 1093 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURTBookmark this Case MUNEER AHMED vs GALYAT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Ss — 2023 CLC 1093 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT

Case information

Citation: 2023 CLC 1093 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT
Court: Peshawar High Court
Year: 2023
Reporter: CLC
Parties: Citation Name: 2023 CLC 1093 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURTBookmark this Case MUNEER AHMED vs GALYAT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Ss
Subject matter: Civil
Provisions referred to: S. 4; S. 3; S. 14

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Citation Name: 2023 CLC 1093 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURTBookmark this Case MUNEER AHMED VS GALYAT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Ss.3, 4 & 11---Encroachment, removal of---Petitioner was aggrieved of interference of authorities in his possession over suit plot---Petitioner approached Civil Court but his plaint was returned to approach competent forum---Validity---Provisions of S. 4 of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Public Property (Removal of Encroachment) Act, 1977, could only be pressed into service when order under S. 3 of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Public Property (Removal of Encroachment) Act, 1977, was served upon an aggrieved person, who in addition to right of review could also file a suit or application before the Tribunal under S.14 of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Public Property (Removal of Encroachment) Act, 1977---If Petitioner had any grievance against officials of respondent Authority for interference in his possession, he had remedy before Civil Court, which had plenary jurisdiction in the matter--- Petitioner had already filed a suit for redressal of his grievance but his earlier suit was returned for want of jurisdiction---Petitioner was technically knocked out and was left high and dry which was not the essence of law---Petitioner had a valid case before Civil Court unless he was ordered to remove encroachment if any, under Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Public Property (Removal of Encroachment) Act, 1977---High Court declined to interfere in the matter, as petitioner could competently have recourse to Civil Court in case of non-observance of legal formalities under S.3 of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Public Property (Removal of Encroachment) Act, 1977---Constitutional petition was disposed of accordingly.

Other judgments reported in 2023 CLC

2023 CLC 994 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANREHMDIL VS Mst. BIBI S.5, Sched.---Suit for recovery of dower and maintenance---Scope---Petitioner assailed ex-parte judgment and decree pas…
2023 CLC 1965 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANSALAM INTERNATIONAL VS SECRETARY MINISTRY OF LAW AND PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS, GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN, CIVIL SECRETARIAT, QUETTA Ss.3, 8, 9,…
2023 CLC 1489 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANNAVEED AHMED VS FAMILY JUDGE, PANJGUR S.14---Constitution of Pakistan, Art.199---Constitutional petition---Maintainability---Decree passed b…
2023 CLC 143 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANBEHZAD HUSSAIN VS Bibi ANSA S.5, Sched.---Suit for recovery of dowry articles---Scope---Petitioner assailed judgments and decrees passed by…
2023 CLC 143 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANBEHZAD HUSSAIN VS Bibi ANSA S.17---Provisions of Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984 and Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 not to apply---Scope---Bare readin…
2023 CLC 1959 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURTCitation Name: 2023 CLC 1959 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURTBookmark this Case FARMAN ULLAH VS Mst. SHAHEEN AKHTAR S.9---Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964…

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English