PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

MUHAMMAD MOINUDDIN KHAN vs DISTRICT JUDGE, ISLAMABAD Ss — 2023 CLC 1315 ISLAMABAD

Case information

Citation
2023 CLC 1315 ISLAMABAD
Court
Islamabad High Court
Year
2023
Reporter
CLC
Parties
MUHAMMAD MOINUDDIN KHAN vs DISTRICT JUDGE, ISLAMABAD Ss
Subject matter
Civil
Provisions referred to
S. 12; S. 35

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

MUHAMMAD MOINUDDIN KHAN VS DISTRICT JUDGE, ISLAMABAD Ss. 12(2) & 35(1)(i)---Constitution of Pakistan, Art.199---Constitutional petition--- False and vexatious litigation---Cost of litigation, awarding of---Petitioner filed ejectment petition claiming himself as owner of suit property, which was decreed ex-parte in favour of petitioner--- Respondent claimed to be owner of suit property and had filed application under S.12(2), C.P.C. against ex-parte order which order was set aside and was maintained by Lower Appellate Court---Validity---Previous owner entered appearance and had authenticated transfer of suit property in the name of respondent---Original owner too was burdened with frivolous litigation and an injury to his valuable property on the basis of false and vexatious litigation was caused---Respondent had to file an application under S.12(2), C.P.C., for getting ex-parte eviction order set aside and also contest revision petition filed by the petitioner and present Constitutional petition---Respondent was unnecessarily dragged in litigation by petitioner---Petitioner repeatedly abused Courts in order to fulfill his evil design of grabbing valuable property of respondent---Petitioner repeatedly filed vexatious and frivolous claims in various Courts and had wasted precious time of Courts---Petitioner caused anguish and pain which was brought to other party by unnecessary, unfair and prolonged litigation---Respondents filed their respective costs of litigation statements in terms of S.35 (1)(i), C.P.C.---High Court declined to interfere in concurrent findings of two Courts below and had awarded cost of litigation to respondents against petitioner---Constitutional petition was dismissed accordingly.

Other judgments reported in 2023 CLC

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English