Citation Name: 2023 CLC 155 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURTBookmark this Case RIAZ & SONS vs SECRETARY, COMMUNICATION AND WORKS DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA, PESHAWAR Void order — 2023 CLC 155 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT

Case information

Citation: 2023 CLC 155 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT
Court: Peshawar High Court
Year: 2023
Reporter: CLC
Parties: Citation Name: 2023 CLC 155 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURTBookmark this Case RIAZ & SONS vs SECRETARY, COMMUNICATION AND WORKS DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA, PESHAWAR Void order
Subject matter: Constitutional
Provisions referred to: S. 35---K

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Citation Name: 2023 CLC 155 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURTBookmark this Case RIAZ & SONS VS SECRETARY, COMMUNICATION AND WORKS DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA, PESHAWAR Void order---Person who wants to impugn any order must do so within the limitation period and even if the order is void, he has to plead his knowledge and then prove the same through cogent and reliable evidence, so as to legally justify his claim. Citation Name: 2023 CLC 155 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURTBookmark this Case RIAZ & SONS VS SECRETARY, COMMUNICATION AND WORKS DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA, PESHAWAR S.35---Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Public Procurement Grievance Redressal Rules, 2017, R.6---Grievance petition---Limitation---Petitioner company was aggrieved of bidding process and order passed by Grievance Redressal Committee dismissing the complaint---Validity---If a procuring entity failed to decide complaint within the stipulated time period, which was eight days as envisaged in R.6 of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Public Procurement Grievance Redressal Rules, 2017, an aggrieved bidder could file appeal with the Authority--- Petitioner filed appeal after more than 3 months and 23 days, which appeal was rejected by Competent Authority---Appeal filed by petitioner was barred by time without any cogent and convincing reason for condonation of delay---High Court declined to interfere in the matter---Constitutional petition was dismissed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2023 CLC

2023 CLC 1510 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANHAFEEZULLAH VS Dr. MUNIR AHMED Gift---Oral gift---Gift in favour of minor---Scope---Gift in favour of minor is not invalid if physical posse…
2023 CLC 685 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANSHAHEEN ALAM VS Mst. BIBI SALMA (Widow) S.278---Petition for letters of administration---Scope---Administration suit in view of the Successi…
2023 CLC 1008 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHMst. BASHIRA BIBI VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Defence S.1---Recovery of damages---Vicarious liability---Employe…
2023 CLC 1008 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHMst. BASHIRA BIBI VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Defence Civil liability---Acquittal in criminal case---Effect---E…
2023 CLC 1721 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANMUHAMMAD SAEED VS The CHAIRMAN, BALOCHISTAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION S. 114 & O. XLVII, R. 1---Review---Scope---Courts are vested with the…
2023 CLC 1721 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANMUHAMMAD SAEED VS The CHAIRMAN, BALOCHISTAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION art.199---Constitutional jurisdiction---Factual controversy---Scope---…

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English