PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HOUSING AND WORKS vs AKHTAR HUSSAIN Ss — 2023 CLC 59 ISLAMABAD

Case information

Citation
2023 CLC 59 ISLAMABAD
Court
Islamabad High Court
Year
2023
Reporter
CLC
Parties
SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HOUSING AND WORKS vs AKHTAR HUSSAIN Ss
Subject matter
Civil

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HOUSING AND WORKS VS AKHTAR HUSSAIN Ss.42 & 54---Suit for declaration and injunction---Contractual liability---Terms and conditions of contract---Tentative price quoted in a brochure---Respondents/plaintiffs assailed letter issued by defendant Pakistan Housing Authority (PHA) raising extra demand towards final consideration amount of houses in question---Trial Court decreed the suit in favour of respondents / plaintiffs and directed defendant / Authority to hand over possession to respondents / plaintiffs without payment of extra money--- Validity--- Relationship between appellant / PHA and respondents / plaintiffs was contractual in nature---Provisions of brochure issued by PHA and terms and conditions attached with application forms were of binding contractual force on the parties---Court could not alter terms of contract or rewrite contract or create a new contract between the parties---Contract was to be read as a whole and not be dissected---Terms of contract were to be construed strictly without altering nature of the contract---Respondents / plaintiffs were put on notice that prices quoted in brochure were tentative and were liable to be revised--- Respondents / plaintiffs applied for apartments under the Project, entered contractual realm and could not then make a grievance of revised rates--- Appellant / PHA had a responsibility to act fairly and reasonably while fixing price for sale of apartments belonging to it--- Direction given by Trial Court to appellant / PHA to give possession of apartments to respondents / plaintiffs without demanding additional cost had effect of directing PHA to sell them at a price that could result in a loss to it--- Demand of appellant / Authority was not something contrary to contract between parties and was envisaged by terms and conditions of the brochure---High Court set aside judgment and decree passed by Trial Court---Appeal was allowed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2023 CLC

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English