PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

MUHAMMAD AZHAR vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Law and Justice, Islamabad Ss — 2023 CLC 935 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Case information

Citation
2023 CLC 935 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH
Court
Sindh High Court
Year
2023
Reporter
CLC
Parties
MUHAMMAD AZHAR vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Law and Justice, Islamabad Ss
Subject matter
Constitutional
Provisions referred to
S. 6---N; S. 20; S. 6; General Clauses Act (X of 1897); Pakistan Medical Commission Act; Dental Council Ordinance; General Clauses Act

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

MUHAMMAD AZHAR VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Law and Justice, Islamabad Ss.20, 27 & 29---General Clauses Act (X of 1897), S.6---National Licensing Examination---House job---Licensing---Effect of repeal---Scope---Petitioner invoked the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court seeking a declaration that passing the National Licensing Examination (NLE), as prescribed under S.20 of the Pakistan Medical Commission Act, 2020, was not applicable in his case and could not be a condition imposed on him by the Pakistan Medical Commission (PMC) for obtaining a full license to practice medicine---Petitioner argued that he was entitled to a full license after successfully completing the five professional examinations and one-year compulsory house job under the Pakistan Medical and Dental Council Ordinance, 1962, which was in force when he commenced the MBBS program---Petitioner contended that the mandatory requirement of passing the NLE was introduced subsequently through the Pakistan Medical Commission Act, 2020, which would not operate retrospectively and that he had a vested right to a full license upon meeting the requirements prescribed under the erstwhile statutory framework---Validity---Petitioner's argument was flawed, and there was no legal basis for it---Even under the earlier dispensation, i.e. Admission in MBBS and BDS course and Housejob/Internship/Foundation Years Regulation, 2013 the right to a full license crystalized only upon satisfactory completion of the housejob and clearance of the assessment exam---Thus, neither the Regulations of 2013 admitted any vested right accruing to an aspirant at the outset of the MBBS program---Benefit of S.6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, did not extend to a student who was in the midst of the MBBS program at the time of enactment of the Pakistan Medical Commission Act, 2020, and had not even embarked upon his one-year housejob---Petitioner's case for a full license was governed by the Pakistan Medical Commission Act, 2020, which was the statute in force when the petitioner had completed his medical education---Petitioner could not be heard to say that his case for a full license should be governed under the erstwhile Ordinance---Accordingly, the constitutional petition was dismissed.

Other judgments reported in 2023 CLC

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English