PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

FAYSAL BANK LIMITED vs Ch — 2023 CLD 1390 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Citation
2023 CLD 1390 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
Court
Lahore High Court
Year
2023
Reporter
CLD
Parties
FAYSAL BANK LIMITED vs Ch
Subject matter
Civil
Provisions referred to
S. 9---Q

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

FAYSAL BANK LIMITED VS Ch. SHEHZAD MUNIR S. 9---Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), Arts. 76 & 77---Secondary evidence---Non-issuance of notice---Principle---Petitioner/defendant/ Bank was aggrieved of order passed by Trial Court allowing respondents/plaintiffs to produce documents as secondary evidence---Plea raised by petitioner/Bank was that secondary evidence could not be adduced without issuing notice in such regard---Validity---Requirement of notice to be issued was relevant in a situation when a document was required to be produced from the possession of a person---Documents to be produced were no more in the possession of petitioner/Bank and had been submitted in another Court---No notice was required to be issued to Bank---Respondents/plaintiffs had a prima facie case and they deserved permission to lead secondary evidence---High Court declined to interfere in permission to produce secondary evidence--- Revision was dismissed , in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2023 CLD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English