PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

ZAHIDA BIBI vs SUMMIT BANK LIMITED O — 2023 CLD 1551 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Citation
2023 CLD 1551 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
Court
Lahore High Court
Year
2023
Reporter
CLD
Parties
ZAHIDA BIBI vs SUMMIT BANK LIMITED O
Subject matter
Civil
Provisions referred to
Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908); Limitation Act (IX of 1908); Limitation Act

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

ZAHIDA BIBI VS SUMMIT BANK LIMITED O. XXI, R. 66---Execution of decree---Sale by auction---Reserve price, objection against---Principle---Objection regarding reserve price cannot be taken by judgment debtor after the auction is held---Duty to raise such objection at the initial stage is cast on judgment debtor. Ss. 19 & 22---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. XXI, R. 67---Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Art. 166---Execution of decree---Sale, setting aside of---Limitation---Publicity of auction proceedings---Mandatory requirement---Appellants/judgment debtors assailed auction proceedings conducted by Court Auctioneer---Executing Court dismissed objection petition filed by appellants/judgment debtors---Validity---In execution proceedings involving Court Auctioneer, sale of immovable property became complete when bid was accepted by Court---For the purpose of Art. 166 of Limitation Act, 1908 time was to start to run from the date the highest offer was accepted by Court---Objection petition filed by appellants/judgment debtors was not barred by limitation as it was filed on 18-10-2016 i.e. 30th day of the auction held on 08-09-2016---Reserve price of property was fixed at Rs. 108,171,850/- and to ensure proper publicity, Executing Court had to have exercised authority vested in it under R. 67(2), C.P.C. to order proclamation to be published in at least one widely circulated daily newspaper---Such failure caused injustice to appellants/judgment debtors---Only respondent/decree holder participated in auction and it provided a convenient walkover to respondent/decree holder to purchase the property at reserve price---Division Bench of High Court set aside the sale and remanded the matter to Executing Court to proceed with execution of decree in accordance with law---Appeal was allowed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2023 CLD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English