PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

The BANK OF PUNJAB vs HASCOL PETROLEUM LIMITED Ss — 2023 CLD 920 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Case information

Citation
2023 CLD 920 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH
Court
Sindh High Court
Year
2023
Reporter
CLD
Parties
The BANK OF PUNJAB vs HASCOL PETROLEUM LIMITED Ss
Subject matter
Civil
Provisions referred to
S. 4---S; S. 9; S. 3; Books Evidence Act (XVIII of 1891); Book Evidence Act

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

The BANK OF PUNJAB VS HASCOL PETROLEUM LIMITED Ss. 3, 9 & 10---Bankers' Books Evidence Act (XVIII of 1891), S. 4---Suit for recovery of finances---Indoor management, doctrine of---Authority to file suit---Principle---Leave to defend the suit, refusal of---Effect---Suit for recovery of two finance facilities was filed by Bank against defendants---Validity---Statement of account was duly verified under Bankers' Book Evidence Act, 1891 and entries therein were not consciously and lawfully disputed by defendants---Authority of person filing plaint on the strength of Power of Attorney was the question of doctrine of indoor management, that was concerned with authorization and was never considered as substantial question of law---Authorization from Power of Attorney was recognized in terms of S. 9 of Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001 and on account of principle of Indoor Management, it was only the principal who could object to it---Defendants neither denied execution of agreement nor challenged authority to execute agreement with them on behalf of plaintiff bank---This was not a question of law that could form substantial question out of the pleadings in consideration of law of Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001 and execution of documents in particular---Defendants availed two facilities i.e. Letter of Credit and Running Facility---High Court declined to grant leave to defendants and suit was decreed along with cost of funds in terms of S. 3 of Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001---Suit was decreed accordingly.

Other judgments reported in 2023 CLD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English