Citation Name: 2023 MLD 1317 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURTBookmark this Case Mst. JAMEELA KHURSHEED vs MUHAMMAD SADDIQ S — 2023 MLD 1317 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT

Case information

Citation: 2023 MLD 1317 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT
Court: Peshawar High Court
Year: 2023
Reporter: MLD
Parties: Citation Name: 2023 MLD 1317 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURTBookmark this Case Mst. JAMEELA KHURSHEED vs MUHAMMAD SADDIQ S
Subject matter: Civil
Provisions referred to: S. 135---C

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Citation Name: 2023 MLD 1317 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURTBookmark this Case Mst. JAMEELA KHURSHEED VS MUHAMMAD SADDIQ S. 135---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199---Partition proceedings before Revenue Officer--- Factual controversy--- Constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court---Scope---Petitioners/share-holders invoked constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court against carving of Tatima on the basis of report of commission---Held, that determination of possession of parties could only be made through spot inspection---Such controversy could not be determined by invoking constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court---When there are conflicting claims of factual nature pending before the Court of competent jurisdiction, then the factual controversy should be left to such Court for decision---No case for interference through constitutional petition was made out---Constitutional petition was dismissed, in circumstances. Citation Name: 2023 MLD 1317 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURTBookmark this Case Mst. JAMEELA KHURSHEED VS MUHAMMAD SADDIQ S. 135---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199---Partition proceedings before Revenue Officer---Prejudice was alleged by the petitioners against a Revenue Officer at appellate forum who had already adjudicated the matter as a subordinate Revenue Officer---Validity---Record revealed that on previous occasions, the said Revenue Officer had allowed every petition/appeal of the petitioners while serving in different capacities---Petitioners, legally, could not raise objection of mala fide or prejudice---No case of interference by the High Court under constitutional jurisdiction was made-out---Constitutional petition was dismissed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2023 MLD

2023 MLD 226 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANBAHADUR KHAN VS MUHAMMAD ANWAR S. 115---Revisional jurisdiction of High Court---Scope---Though scope of revisional jurisdiction is limited b…
2023 MLD 226 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANBAHADUR KHAN VS MUHAMMAD ANWAR Fatwa---Proof---Fatwa cannot be relied unless its authority/ signatory is produced in Court and is subjected…
2023 MLD 1131 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHKARACHI CABLE SERVICES (PVT.) LTD. VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Information S. 30--- Cable operators---Show cause…
2023 MLD 989 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHWASEEM AKRAM VS Mst. ASMA S. 25a---Transfer of cases---Scope---applicant/defendant (husband) sought transfer of suit for maintenance from on…
2023 MLD 742 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHSANWAL alias CHARYA VS State Ss. 302 & 34---Qatl-i-amd, common intention---Appreciation of evidence---Safe custody of crime empties---Scope-…
2023 MLD 1086 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANPERVAIZ VS State S. 302(b)--- Qatl-i-amd--- Appreciation of evidence--- Sentence, reduction in---Mitigating circumstances---No pre-mediation…

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English