PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Citation Name: 2023 MLD 2088 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREBookmark this Case FAYSAL BANK LIMITED vs Ch — 2023 MLD 2088 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Citation
2023 MLD 2088 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
Court
Lahore High Court
Year
2023
Reporter
MLD
Parties
Citation Name: 2023 MLD 2088 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREBookmark this Case FAYSAL BANK LIMITED vs Ch
Subject matter
Civil
Provisions referred to
S. 9---S

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Citation Name: 2023 MLD 2088 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREBookmark this Case FAYSAL BANK LIMITED VS Ch. SHEHZAD MUNIR arts. 76 & 77---Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance (XLVI of 2001), S. 9---Secondary evidence---Non-issuance of notice---Principle---Petitioner/defendant/ Bank was aggrieved of order passed by Trial Court allowing respondents/plaintiffs to produce documents as secondary evidence---Plea raised by petitioner/Bank was that secondary evidence could not be adduced without issuing notice in such regard---Validity---Requirement of notice to be issued was relevant in a situation when a document was required to be produced from the possession of a person---Documents to be produced were no more in the possession of petitioner/Bank and had been submitted in another Court---No notice was required to be issued to Bank---Respondents/ plaintiffs had a prima facie case and they deserved permission to lead secondary evidence---High Court declined to interfere in permission to produce secondary evidence--- Revision was dismissed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2023 MLD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English