PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

AMMAD YOUSAF vs GHULAM MURTAZA CHANDIO Ss — 2023 PCrLJ 1256 ISLAMABAD

Case information

Citation
2023 PCrLJ 1256 ISLAMABAD
Court
Islamabad High Court
Year
2023
Reporter
PCRLJ
Parties
AMMAD YOUSAF vs GHULAM MURTAZA CHANDIO Ss
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
S. 265-D

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

AMMAD YOUSAF VS GHULAM MURTAZA CHANDIO Ss. 173, 265 & 265-K--- Framing of charge--- Discharge of accused---Principles---Application of the petitioner was to the effect that no case against him was made out, therefore, charge could not be framed against him---Validity---Court was not to delve into the veracity of the documents or the statements made by the witnesses; even admissibility of the documents or otherwise was also not the domain of the Court at such stage, as it would be holding a trial within trial---Sole purpose of S. 265-D, Cr.P.C was that the report under S. I73, Cr.P.C., and the statements and documents submitted provided prima facie basis to proceed with the trial; if prima facie case was made out, Trial Court was to continue with framing of charge and commencement of trial---Section 265-K, Cr.P.C., provides jurisdiction to Trial Court to discharge/acquit the accused, if it considers that there is no probability of the accused being convicted of the offence---Impugned order did not suffer from error of law or of jurisdiction calling for interference by High Court---Petition was dismissed.

Other judgments reported in 2023 PCRLJ

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English