PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Citation Name: 2023 PCrLJ 468 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREBookmark this Case MUTEEN UR REHMAN vs State S — 2023 PCrLJ 468 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Citation
2023 PCrLJ 468 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
Court
Lahore High Court
Year
2023
Reporter
PCRLJ
Parties
Citation Name: 2023 PCrLJ 468 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREBookmark this Case MUTEEN UR REHMAN vs State S
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
S. 498---P; S. 342; S. 365; Penal Code (XLV of 1860)

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Citation Name: 2023 PCrLJ 468 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREBookmark this Case MUTEEN UR REHMAN VS State S. 498---Pre-arrest bail---Scope---Not possible in each and every case to prove mala fide but the same can be gathered from the facts and circumstances of the case. Citation Name: 2023 PCrLJ 468 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREBookmark this Case MUTEEN UR REHMAN VS State S. 498---Pre-arrest bail---Scope---If an accused has a good case for post-arrest bail then mere at the wish of complainant, he cannot be sent behind the bars for few days by dismissing his application for pre-arrest bail. Your Search returned total 35531 records from 18000 - 18050 Citation Name: 2023 PCrLJ 468 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREBookmark this Case MUTEEN UR REHMAN VS State S. 498---Pre-arrest bail---Scope---While granting pre-arrest bail even the merits of the case can be touched upon. Citation Name: 2023 PCrLJ 468 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREBookmark this Case MUTEEN UR REHMAN VS State S. 498---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 365 & 342---Kidnapping or abducting with intent secretly and wrongfully to confine person---Wrongful confinement---Pre-arrest bail, grant of---Delayed FIR---Scope---Prosecution case was that the victim was abducted on gun point by the accused persons, taken to the shop of an accused, tied with an electric pole and was tortured---First Information Report was lodged with a delay of 07 days---Abductee was not secretly confined, as such, S. 342, P.P.C. would be attracted to the case and not S. 365, P.P.C., however, final determination regarding the applicable provision would be made by the trial court after recording and evaluating the evidence---As far as the allegation of torture and beating was concerned, no Medico-Legal Certificate of the victim was available on record---Criminal as well as civil litigations were pending between the parties, therefore, false involvement of the accused persons at the hands of the complainant party could not be ruled out---Petition for grant of pre-arrest bail was allowed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2023 PCRLJ

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English