PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Mir AHMED vs State Ss — 2023 PCrLJ 558 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN

Case information

Citation
2023 PCrLJ 558 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN
Court
Balochistan High Court
Year
2023
Reporter
PCRLJ
Parties
Mir AHMED vs State Ss
Subject matter
Criminal

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Mir AHMED VS State Ss. 302 & 109---Qatl-i-amd, abetment---Appreciation of evidence---Natural presence of the eye-witnesses at the spot---Accused was charged for committing murder of the brother of the complainant by firing---First Information Report was lodged with remarkable promptitude in which single accused was nominated---Ocular account in the case had been furnished by the complainant and four other witnesses, so five eye-witnesses were produced by the prosecution---Presence of the said eye-witnesses at the place of incident was justified as one witness was the father of the deceased, while three other witnesses were real brothers of deceased and they all were living in the same house which fact was not disputed by the defense side during cross-examination---Apart from that another eye-witness lived in the neighborhood of the deceased, therefore the presence of thesaid witnesses at the place of incident was natural and logically they were the natural eye-witnesses as incident took place just after Sehri time, in early hours of the morning, in front of the house of deceased---Circumstances established that the prosecution successfully brought home the charge against the accused beyond any shadow of doubt---Appeal against conviction was dismissed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2023 PCRLJ

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English