PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

GHULAM ALI alias LAMI vs State Ss — 2023 PCrLJ 671 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Case information

Citation
2023 PCrLJ 671 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH
Court
Sindh High Court
Year
2023
Reporter
PCRLJ
Parties
GHULAM ALI alias LAMI vs State Ss
Subject matter
Criminal

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

GHULAM ALI alias LAMI VS State Ss. 302, 324, 311, 148 & 149---Qatl-i-amd, attempt to commit qatl-i-amd, tazir after waiver or compounding of right of qisas in qatl-i-amd, rioting armed with deadly weapon, unlawful assembly---Appreciation of evidence---Fair trial---Scope---Accused were charged for committing murder of wife of accused and injuring her paramour---Record showed that the Trial Court recorded examination-in-chief of official witnesses in absence of the advocate for the accused and it was observed that the present case carried capital punishment and evidence (examination-in-chief, cross-examination and re-examination) of prosecution witnesses should be recorded in presence of his advocate---Logically, most of accused were laymen who would have little, if any, knowledge of the law and in the absence of defence counsel would be unable to adequately defend themselves---Inability on the part of accused, it would lead to an unfair trial and the same was in violation of Art. 10-A of the Constitution---Legal position was clear that a fair opportunity was not provided to the accused at the time of recording examination-in-chief of the prosecution witnesses---If counsel for the accused would have been present, possibility could not be ruled out that he might have raised objection on some legal issues---It was the mandate of the law that the cases involving capital punishment would not be tried in absence of the counsel for the accused---Circumstances suggested that the accused were prejudiced in the trial and defence, thus, a miscarriage of justice had been committed in the case---Procedure adopted by the Trial Court was illegal which was not curable and had vitiated the trial, therefore, the impugned judgment was required to be set aside---Appeal was partly allowed by setting aside conviction and sentences recorded by the trial court and the case was remanded to the Trial Court for re-trial from the stage of recording of evidence of the prosecution witnesses.

Other judgments reported in 2023 PCRLJ

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English