AIJAZ ALI vs State Ss — 2023 PCrLJN 49 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

AIJAZ ALI VS State Ss. 302, 311 & 201---Qatl-i-amd, tazir after waiver or compounding of right to qisas in qatl-i-amd, disappearance of evidence---Appreciation of evidence---Benefit of doubt---Call Data Record---Non-availability of voice record transcript of spy informer---Effect---Accused was charged for committing murder of her wife and throwing her in the canal---Allegedly, the Investigation Officer had received spy information on his cellular phone, however, the Call Data showing the time of the receipt of the call from spy informer and location was not produced before the Trial Court, in order to satisfy the court that Police had actually received spy information at the relevant time---No voice record was also produced---Prosecution had failed to prove its case beyond any shadow of doubt, in circumstances---Appeal against conviction was allowed, in circumstances.

AIJAZ ALI vs State Ss — 2023 PCrLJN 49 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Case information

Judgment text as reported