Syed TAHIR SHAH vs PRINTING CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN Promotion — 2023 PLC 58 NATIONAL-INDUSTRIAL-RELATIONS-COMMISSION

Case information

Citation: 2023 PLC 58 NATIONAL-INDUSTRIAL-RELATIONS-COMMISSION
Year: 2023
Reporter: PLC
Parties: Syed TAHIR SHAH vs PRINTING CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN Promotion
Subject matter: Criminal
Provisions referred to: S. 33---R

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Syed TAHIR SHAH VS PRINTING CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN Promotion---Scope---Promotion of an employee takes place after fulfillment of basic requirements of length of service, ACRs, availability of vacancies, etc. S.33---Redressal of individual grievances---Reversion of an employee---Scope---Petitioners, who were regular employees, were promoted to next grade after approval of the competent authority but after 35 days they were reverted back to their previous posts---Contention of department was that the Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) had promoted certain persons including the petitioners for the next grade, without completion of length of service therefore, the Authority after confirmation of said discrepancies had cancelled the promotions---Validity---Some of the petitioners had not completed the required length of service---Dispatch Rider was 100% direct post and Naib Qasid was not eligible for promotion to that post---One of the petitioners was promoted notwithstanding incomplete ACR (Annual Confidential Report) dossier---One of the petitioners was illegally promoted against a post which was not vacant---Departmental Promotion Committee had illegally recommended the promotions---Minimum length of service as required for promotion to certain post was sine qua non for consideration of promotion---Commission in the interest of justice held that the petitioners would be promoted after removal of illegalities---Petition was disposed of accordingly. When the doing of anything in a particular manner is sanctioned by law, that thing cannot be done in a different manner.

Other judgments reported in 2023 PLC

2023 PLC(CS) 802 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURTSHER KHAN VS SECRETARY, ESTABLISHMENT (ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION), CABINET SECRETARIAT, ISLAMABAD Petitioner prayed for issuance of an appropri…
2023 PLC(CS) 1561 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURTCitation Name: 2023 PLC(CS) 1561 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURTBookmark this Case MUHAMMAD ASLAM VS GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA Ss. 2(aa) & 3---Co…
2023 PLC(CS) 464 SUPREME-COURTMUHAMMAD NAEEM VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN S. 2(1)(b)---Government Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules 1973, R. 2(1)--- Government Serv…
2023 PLC(CS) 440 SUPREME-COURTDIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT POSTAL SERVICES JHANG VS SIDDIQUE AHMED Misappropriation of public money---Dismissal from service--- Scope---Misap…
2023 PLC(CS) 1148 SUPREME-COURTCONTROLLER GENERAL OF ACCOUNTS, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD VS ABDUL WAHEED Promotion---amendment in promotion Rules---amended Rules n…
2023 PLC(CS) 1392 SUPREME-COURTASRAR AHMED VS CHAIRMAN PAKISTAN AERONAUTICAL COMPLEX BOARD, KAMRA Maxim 'qui approbat non reprobat' (one who approbates cannot reprobate)--…

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English