ABRAR AHMED JUNIOR DRAWING TEACHER vs SECRETARY ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR, MUZAFFARABAD art — 2023 PLC(CS) 289 HIGH-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR

Case information

Citation: 2023 PLC(CS) 289 HIGH-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR
Year: 2023
Reporter: PLC
Parties: ABRAR AHMED JUNIOR DRAWING TEACHER vs SECRETARY ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR, MUZAFFARABAD art
Subject matter: Service

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

ABRAR AHMED JUNIOR DRAWING TEACHER VS SECRETARY ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR, MUZAFFARABAD art.44---Writ jurisdiction---Factual controversy---Scope---Questions of fact cannot be determined by the High Court while exercising powers under article 44 of the azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution, 1974. Head NotesCase Description Citation Name: 2023 PLC(CS) 289 HIGH-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIRBookmark this Case ABRAR AHMED JUNIOR DRAWING TEACHER VS SECRETARY ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR, MUZAFFARABAD art.44---Writ jurisdiction---Scope---Writ can be issued where any violation of rules or departure of law has been made. Head NotesCase Description Citation Name: 2023 PLC(CS) 289 HIGH-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIRBookmark this Case ABRAR AHMED JUNIOR DRAWING TEACHER VS SECRETARY ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR, MUZAFFARABAD Promotion---Production of photostat copies---Scope---Petitioner sought direction to the respondents to promote him against the post of Senior Drawing Teacher which became vacant due to retirement of its incumbent---Validity---Name of petitioner was placed at serial no. 9 of the seniority list and the petitioner had not arrayed other teachers as party in the memo of writ petition---Date of issuance of seniority list was nowhere mentioned, which was an unattested photostat copy---Retirement order was also not brought on record---Determination of seniority of employees was an administrative matter falling within the exclusive domain and a policy decision of the Government or the competent authority, which could not be determined through writ jurisdiction---Writ petition, having no statutory backing, was dismissed. Head NotesCase Description

Other judgments reported in 2023 PLC

2023 PLC(CS) 605 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHRASHEED AHMED VS PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANY LIMITED O.II, R.2---"Cause of action"---Connotation---Expression "cause of action" means…
2023 PLC(CS) 1119 SUPREME-COURTDIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, POSTAL SERVICES, D.G. KHAN VS NADEEM RAZA Misappropriation or embezzlement of public funds---Moral turpitude---Sc…
2023 PLC(CS) 1119 SUPREME-COURTDIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, POSTAL SERVICES, D.G. KHAN VS NADEEM RAZA S. 5---Service Tribunal, powers of---Scope---Under Section 5 of the Ser…
2023 PLC(CS) 928 SUPREME-COURTFEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Chairman Federal Board of Revenue FBR House, Islamabad VS ZAHID MALIK all judicial, quasi-judicial and admini…
2023 PLC(CS) 928 SUPREME-COURTFEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Chairman Federal Board of Revenue FBR House, Islamabad VS ZAHID MALIK Remand of a case to the lower fora---Sc…
2023 PLC(CS) 860 SUPREME-COURTAMANULLAH KHAN VS HOSPITAL DIRECTOR, KTH (MTI), PESHAWAR Upgradation of a post---Scope---In order to justify the upgradation, the Government…

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English