PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

FAISAL RASHEED vs SINDH EMPLOYEES SOCIAL SECURITY INSTITUTION art — 2023 PLC(CS)N 3 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Case information

Citation
2023 PLC(CS)N 3 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH
Court
Sindh High Court
Year
2023
Reporter
PLC
Parties
FAISAL RASHEED vs SINDH EMPLOYEES SOCIAL SECURITY INSTITUTION art
Subject matter
Constitutional

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

FAISAL RASHEED VS SINDH EMPLOYEES SOCIAL SECURITY INSTITUTION art. 199---Constitutional petition---Service matter---Restoration in service---Factual controversy---Petitioners were employees of Sindh Employees Social Security Institution, whose services were dispensed with on the accusation of lack of academic appointment without fulfilment of codal formalities---Validity---appointment in the public office could only be made through competitive process on merit as provided under recruitment rules, without any discrimination, and in a transparent manner---all appointments in public institutions must be based on a process that was substantially and tangibly fair and within the parameters of its applicable rules, regulations, and bylaws, i.e. advertisement, written test, and interview by recruitment/selection committee---If candidate had applied based on such an admissible quota under law he could be accommodated subject to his qualification for the post under recruitment rules---High Court declined to entertain claims, and counter-claims of parties as those were disputed questions of facts and could not be adjudicated by High Court while exercising Constitutional Jurisdiction---High Court declined to adjudicate petition under art. 199 of the Constitution and left the matter upon competent authority of respondent Institution---High Court pointed out that respondent-Sindh Employees Social Security Institute did not realize its own mistake in time by recruiting petitioners in year 1998 and onwards without advertisement, disclosing academic pre-requisites, and they continued to avail their services; and, after a considerable period, they perceived that their basic appointments were not under the Service Regulations of SESSI---High Court directed the Institution to scrutinize/examine eligibility of petitioners and those whose academic degrees, which they were holding at the time of initial appointment, were verified, would be retained as employees--- Constitutional petition was disposed of accordingly.

Other judgments reported in 2023 PLC

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English