PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

AIJAZ vs PROVINCE OF SINDH art — 2023 PLC(CS)N 52 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Case information

Citation
2023 PLC(CS)N 52 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH
Court
Sindh High Court
Year
2023
Reporter
PLC
Parties
AIJAZ vs PROVINCE OF SINDH art
Subject matter
Constitutional

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

AIJAZ VS PROVINCE OF SINDH art.199---Constitutional petition---Question of fact---Scope---Petitioners sought directions to the respondents to release their monthly salaries---Respondent argued that the petitioners had got their appointments through backdoor, thus could not agitate any grievance on the pretext of denial of due opportunity of hearing to them---Validity---High Court could not determine the veracity of the documents, petitioners' claims and counter-claims, being disputed questions of facts between the parties, could not be adjudicated by the High Court while exercising its constitutional jurisdiction---High Court could not give sanctity to the appointment letters of the petitioners---Chief Secretary was directed to constitute a committee headed by him, conduct an inquiry of alleged fraud/forgery in the appointments and subsequent events, after providing ample opportunity of hearing to the petitioners, fix responsibility and take action against the delinquent officials strictly in accordance with law and submit a report to the Court---Constitutional petitions were dismissed accordingly.

Other judgments reported in 2023 PLC

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English