PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Citation Name: 2023 PLC(CS)N 63 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANBookmark this Case ABDUL MALIK vs DIRETOR GENERAL (D — 2023 PLC(CS)N 63 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN

Case information

Citation
2023 PLC(CS)N 63 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN
Court
Balochistan High Court
Year
2023
Reporter
PLC
Parties
Citation Name: 2023 PLC(CS)N 63 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANBookmark this Case ABDUL MALIK vs DIRETOR GENERAL (D
Subject matter
Constitutional

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Citation Name: 2023 PLC(CS)N 63 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANBookmark this Case ABDUL MALIK VS DIRETOR GENERAL (D.G.) QUETTA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (QDA) Contract appointment without advertisement---Legality---Safeguard against discrimination in service---Scope---Petitioner was appointed on contract basis without any advertisement, which was violation of right of other citizens to equality of opportunity---Discrimination among the citizens could not be allowed under Art. 27 of the Constitution---No one could be preferred over the other---All the citizens were equal in the eye of law and transparency entailed equal opportunity---Person eligible in terms of criteria and qualification had a right to be given fair consideration through transparent process---Merit could not be ensured without transparency---Purpose of advertisement was that the eligible candidate could apply and appear in test and interview---Every citizen had equal rights---Appointment without advertisement could deprive the aspirant to apply for the post---Constitutional petition was dismissed, in circumstances. Citation Name: 2023 PLC(CS)N 63 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANBookmark this Case ABDUL MALIK VS DIRETOR GENERAL (D.G.) QUETTA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (QDA) Contract appointment---Termination from service---No right of regularization---Record revealed that the respondent-authority appointed the petitioner for six months on contract basis---Petitioner without any objection accepted the terms and conditions and thereafter submitted his joining report---Service of such employee could be terminated without assigning any reason---Employee could not claim extension/regularization in his contract period as a vested right---Employer was well within his right to retain or dispose with the services of a employee---Constitutional petition was dismissed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2023 PLC

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English