HUMAYUN LATIF vs STATE through Advocate General Azad Jammu and Kashmir S — 2023 PLD 100 HIGH-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR

Case information

Citation: 2023 PLD 100 HIGH-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR
Year: 2023
Reporter: PLD
Parties: HUMAYUN LATIF vs STATE through Advocate General Azad Jammu and Kashmir S
Subject matter: Criminal
Provisions referred to: S. 497---P; S. 15; S. 497; Penal Code (XLV of 1860); Ammunition Act (III of 2016)

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

HUMAYUN LATIF VS STATE through Advocate General Azad Jammu and Kashmir S. 497---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 302, 341, 114 & 109---Azad Jammu and Kashmir Arms and Ammunition Act (III of 2016), S. 15(2)---Qalt-i-amd, punishment for wrongful restraint, abettor present when offence is committed and abetment---Bail, refusal of---Desperate and hardened criminal---Alleged occurrence took place at a public place, which was a main chowk of Bazar while the manner in which the occurrence took place appeared to have caused horror, threat and fear in general public---Case of accused undoubtedly fell within the definition of dangerous criminal due to gravity of manner of occurrence---Tentative assessment of contents of FIR, autopsy report of deceased and statements of prosecution witnesses, prima-facie, depicted that the accused repeatedly fired 6/7 bullet shots in a public place i.e. main chowk---Bail application was dismissed, in circumstances. Head NotesCase Description Citation Name: 2023 PLD 100 HIGH-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIRBookmark this Case HUMAYUN LATIF VS STATE through Advocate General Azad Jammu and Kashmir S. 497(1), fourth proviso---Expression "hardened, desperate or dangerous criminal" as used in the fourth proviso to S. 497(1), Cr.P.C.---Scope of the expression "hardened, desperate or dangerous criminal" explained. Head NotesCase Description

Other judgments reported in 2023 PLD

2023 PLD 431 SUPREME-COURTPAKISTAN ELECTRONIC MEDIA REGULATORY AUTHORITY (PEMRA) VS ARY COMMUNICATIONS PRIVATE LIMITED (ARY DIGITAL) R. 4---Councils of Complaints---C…
2023 PLD 431 SUPREME-COURTPAKISTAN ELECTRONIC MEDIA REGULATORY AUTHORITY (PEMRA) VS ARY COMMUNICATIONS PRIVATE LIMITED (ARY DIGITAL) arts. 19 & 19a---Tolerance---Cons…
2023 PLD 174 SUPREME-COURTS.D.O./A.M., Hasht Nagri Sub-Division, PESCO, Peshawar VS KHAWAZAN ZAD S. 99 & O.I, R. 10---Misjoinder of parties---Curable defect---Misjoin…
2023 PLD 588 SUPREME-COURTNADIA NAZ VS The PRESIDENT OF ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD art. 188---Review of judgments by the Supreme Court---Grounds---Error…
2023 PLD 536 SUPREME-COURTGUFRAN ALI VS HASEEB KHAN S. 8(1)---Juvenile---Determination of age---Ossification test---Scope and significance of ossification test in det…
2023 PLD 516 SUPREME-COURTA. RAHIM FOODS (PVT.) LIMITED VS K&N'S FOODS (PVT.) LIMITED S. 10(2)(d)---Deceptive marketing practices, action for---Pre-requisites---Regis…

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English