GIBRALTAR (SMC-PVT.) LIMITED vs SAMAD RUBBER WORKS (PVT — 2023 PLD 149 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Citation: 2023 PLD 149 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
Court: Lahore High Court
Year: 2023
Reporter: PLD
Parties: GIBRALTAR (SMC-PVT.) LIMITED vs SAMAD RUBBER WORKS (PVT
Subject matter: Civil
Provisions referred to: S. 24---H; S. 15---T; S. 15; S. 24; Punjab Civil Courts Ordinance (II of 1962); Punjab Civil Courts Ordinance

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

GIBRALTAR (SMC-PVT.) LIMITED VS SAMAD RUBBER WORKS (PVT.) LTD. S. 24---High Court (Lahore) Rules and Orders, Vol. I, Chap. 13---Punjab Civil Courts Ordinance (II of 1962), S. 15---Transfer of suits---Power to distribute business---Scope---Grievance of the petitioner was that Civil Judge was not competent to entertain the suit under O. XXXVII, C.P.C. filed by respondent and instead of making reference to the District Judge, the Civil Judge should have returned the plaint to the respondent---Second objection of the petitioner was that the District Judge illegally entertained the reference and entrusted the case to an Additional District Judge---Validity---Under Chapter 13, Volume I of the High Court (Lahore) Rules and Orders, the Civil Courts were competent to make a reference of a case to superior authority for its entrustment to any other Court of competent jurisdiction---No illegality had been committed by the Civil Judge and further by way of these proceedings, no prejudice had being caused to the petitioner---District Judge under S. 15 of the Punjab Civil Courts Ordinance, 1962, was competent to entrust / distribute the cases among the Courts of competent jurisdiction---Under S. 24, C.P.C., the District Judge on the application of any of the parties and after notice to the parties or of his own motion, without such notice, could transfer any case or withdraw any case or appeal, etc pending before court subordinate to it---Constitutional petition was dismissed.

Other judgments reported in 2023 PLD

2023 PLD 431 SUPREME-COURTPAKISTAN ELECTRONIC MEDIA REGULATORY AUTHORITY (PEMRA) VS ARY COMMUNICATIONS PRIVATE LIMITED (ARY DIGITAL) R. 4---Councils of Complaints---C…
2023 PLD 431 SUPREME-COURTPAKISTAN ELECTRONIC MEDIA REGULATORY AUTHORITY (PEMRA) VS ARY COMMUNICATIONS PRIVATE LIMITED (ARY DIGITAL) arts. 19 & 19a---Tolerance---Cons…
2023 PLD 174 SUPREME-COURTS.D.O./A.M., Hasht Nagri Sub-Division, PESCO, Peshawar VS KHAWAZAN ZAD S. 99 & O.I, R. 10---Misjoinder of parties---Curable defect---Misjoin…
2023 PLD 588 SUPREME-COURTNADIA NAZ VS The PRESIDENT OF ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD art. 188---Review of judgments by the Supreme Court---Grounds---Error…
2023 PLD 536 SUPREME-COURTGUFRAN ALI VS HASEEB KHAN S. 8(1)---Juvenile---Determination of age---Ossification test---Scope and significance of ossification test in det…
2023 PLD 516 SUPREME-COURTA. RAHIM FOODS (PVT.) LIMITED VS K&N'S FOODS (PVT.) LIMITED S. 10(2)(d)---Deceptive marketing practices, action for---Pre-requisites---Regis…

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English