DEAN/CHIEF EXECUTIVE, GOMAL MEDICAL COLLEGE, MEDICAL TEACHING INSTITUTION, D.I. KHAN vs MUHAMMAD ARMAGHAN KHAN Preamble — 2023 PLD 190 SUPREME-COURT

Case information

Citation: 2023 PLD 190 SUPREME-COURT
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
Year: 2023
Reporter: PLD
Parties: DEAN/CHIEF EXECUTIVE, GOMAL MEDICAL COLLEGE, MEDICAL TEACHING INSTITUTION, D.I. KHAN vs MUHAMMAD ARMAGHAN KHAN Preamble
Subject matter: Service
Provisions referred to: S. 3-B; Preamble---Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973); Pakhtunkhwa Subordinate Judiciary Service Tribunal Act (VIII of 1991); Preamble---Balochistan District Judiciary Act (I of 2021); Preamble---Islamabad Subordinate Judiciary Service Tribunal Act (V of 2016); Capital---Maintainability---Islamabad Subordinate Judiciary Service Tribunal Act (the 2016 Islamabad Act'); Punjab Subordinate Judiciary Service Tribunal Act; Punjab Act; Sindh Service Tribunals Act; Sindh Act; Pakhtunkhwa Subordinate Judiciary Service Tribunal Act; KPK Act

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

DEAN/CHIEF EXECUTIVE, GOMAL MEDICAL COLLEGE, MEDICAL TEACHING INSTITUTION, D.I. KHAN VS MUHAMMAD ARMAGHAN KHAN Preamble---Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), S. 3-B [as amended by the Sindh Service Tribunals (Amendment) Act, 1991]---Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Subordinate Judiciary Service Tribunal Act (VIII of 1991), Preamble---Balochistan District Judiciary Act (I of 2021), Preamble---Islamabad Subordinate Judiciary Service Tribunal Act (V of 2016)---Constitution of Pakistan, Articles 212(2), proviso & 212(3)---Appeal to the Supreme Court under Article 212(3) of the Constitution from orders of Tribunals in relation to District judiciaries in the Provinces and Federal Capital---Maintainability---Islamabad Subordinate Judiciary Service Tribunal Act (the 2016 Islamabad Act') presents no difficulties, as it is Federal legislation and clause (2) of Article 212 of the Constitution applies in relation thereto automatically---Door to clause (3) of Article 212 is therefore open---However, this is not so in respect of the Provincial legislation, being the Punjab Subordinate Judiciary Service Tribunal Act, 1991 ('the 1991 Punjab Act'), the Sindh Service Tribunals Act, 1973 ('the 1973 Sindh Act'), the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Subordinate Judiciary Service Tribunal Act, 1991 ('the 1991 KPK Act'), and the Balochistan District Judiciary Act, 2021 ('the 2021 Balochistan Act')---Position of the Tribunals (for subordinate judiciary) set up under the said laws is different in the sense that no appeal to the Supreme Court is (at present) maintainable under Article 212(3) against decisions of the said Tribunals---Directions issues by the Supreme Court in such regard stated.

Other judgments reported in 2023 PLD

2023 PLD 190 SUPREME-COURTDEAN/CHIEF EXECUTIVE, GOMAL MEDICAL COLLEGE, MEDICAL TEACHING INSTITUTION, D.I. KHAN VS MUHAMMAD ARMAGHAN KHAN arts. 212(2), proviso & 212(3…
2023 PLD 171 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREGUL SHER VS ADDITIONAL AND SESSIONS JUDGE/EX OFFICIO JUSTICE OF PEACE, BHOWANA arts. 25, 34, 36 & 37---Equality of citizens---Full participa…
2023 PLD 324 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORECitation Name: 2023 PLD 324 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREBookmark this Case Mrs. KANEEZ FATIMA VS The ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN Once a benefit…
2023 PLD 321 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHMst. NAZ BIBI VS WAHID BUX Inheritance---Tarkah---Service benefits---Scope---Benevolent fund does not fall within the definition of such pro…
2023 PLD 187 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHGHULAM ASGHAR PATHAN VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN art.37---Promotion of social justice and eradication of social evils---Scope---Speedy justice…
2023 PLD 431 SUPREME-COURTPAKISTAN ELECTRONIC MEDIA REGULATORY AUTHORITY (PEMRA) VS ARY COMMUNICATIONS PRIVATE LIMITED (ARY DIGITAL) Ss. 26(2) & 27(a)---Pakistan Elec…

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English