ABDUL KAREEM vs MUHAMMAD BASIL arts — 2023 PLD 22 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN

Case information

Citation: 2023 PLD 22 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN
Court: Balochistan High Court
Year: 2023
Reporter: PLD
Parties: ABDUL KAREEM vs MUHAMMAD BASIL arts

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

ABDUL KAREEM VS MUHAMMAD BASIL arts. 79 & 113---Document---Proof of execution---Document could not be used as evidence until two attesting witnesses at least had been called for the purpose of proving its execution---Plaintiff was under legal obligation to prove the contents of documents by producing two attesting witnesses if alive but some departure was permissible if the defendants had not denied the execution---Revision was dismissed.

Other judgments reported in 2023 PLD

2023 PLD 431 SUPREME-COURTPAKISTAN ELECTRONIC MEDIA REGULATORY AUTHORITY (PEMRA) VS ARY COMMUNICATIONS PRIVATE LIMITED (ARY DIGITAL) R. 4---Councils of Complaints---C…
2023 PLD 431 SUPREME-COURTPAKISTAN ELECTRONIC MEDIA REGULATORY AUTHORITY (PEMRA) VS ARY COMMUNICATIONS PRIVATE LIMITED (ARY DIGITAL) arts. 19 & 19a---Tolerance---Cons…
2023 PLD 174 SUPREME-COURTS.D.O./A.M., Hasht Nagri Sub-Division, PESCO, Peshawar VS KHAWAZAN ZAD S. 99 & O.I, R. 10---Misjoinder of parties---Curable defect---Misjoin…
2023 PLD 588 SUPREME-COURTNADIA NAZ VS The PRESIDENT OF ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD art. 188---Review of judgments by the Supreme Court---Grounds---Error…
2023 PLD 536 SUPREME-COURTGUFRAN ALI VS HASEEB KHAN S. 8(1)---Juvenile---Determination of age---Ossification test---Scope and significance of ossification test in det…
2023 PLD 516 SUPREME-COURTA. RAHIM FOODS (PVT.) LIMITED VS K&N'S FOODS (PVT.) LIMITED S. 10(2)(d)---Deceptive marketing practices, action for---Pre-requisites---Regis…

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English