TANVIR HUSSAIN MANJI vs NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU art — 2023 PLD 238 ISLAMABAD

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

TANVIR HUSSAIN MANJI VS NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU art. 199--- Constitutional petition--- Laches, principle of---applicability---Laches may be condoned where act of which petitioner is aggrieved is patently illegal and/or to avoid grave injustice. Citation Name: 2023 PLD 238 ISLAMABADBookmark this Case TANVIR HUSSAIN MANJI VS NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU S. 25(b)---Contract Act (IX of 1872), S. 16(3)---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199---Constitutional petition---Plea bargain---Incidental charges---Scope---Undue influence---Proof---Petitioner accused before National Accountability Bureau (NAB) who entered into plea bargain with NAB but assailed imposition of 15% incidental charges over and above the liability so determined---Validity---National Accountability Bureau had no right to demand such incidental charges either in law or equity---Petitioner while he was deprived of his freedom agreed to the same which indicated use of undue influence---Such use of authority resulted in an unfair advantage over the other---National Accountability Bureau obtained an unfair advantage over the petitioner by extracting an amount from him not otherwise due by using its dominant position over petitioner---"Incidental charges" as part of plea bargain were unconscionable---According to section 16 (3) of Contract Act, 1872, burden of proof that contract was not induced by undue influence was on the person who was in a position to dominate the will of another when he entered into contract with such person and where transaction had appeared to be unconscionable---National Accountability Bureau was unable to explain what incidental charges, if any, were incurred in respect of a plea bargain---Law did not authorize NAB to charge the same and NAB had failed to discharge its burden of proof---Public functionaries were expected to act fairly and justly and could not be allowed to profit from predicament of a person in their custody---High Court condoned delay in invoking Constitutional jurisdiction by petitioner---In absence of law and/or expenses incurred by NAB, the clause of plea bargain whereby petitioner agreed to pay incidental charges was unenforceable for lack of free consent---High Court declared that such clause of plea bargain entered into by petitioner was void to the extent of 15% incidental charges and the same could not be recovered from petitioner---Constitutional petition was allowed, in circumstances.

TANVIR HUSSAIN MANJI vs NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU art — 2023 PLD 238 ISLAMABAD

Case information

Judgment text as reported

Other judgments reported in 2023 PLD