PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

ABDUL SATTAR vs The JUDICIAL COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN arts — 2023 PLD 32 SUPREME-COURT

Case information

Citation
2023 PLD 32 SUPREME-COURT
Court
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Year
2023
Reporter
PLD
Parties
ABDUL SATTAR vs The JUDICIAL COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN arts
Subject matter
Criminal

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

ABDUL SATTAR VS The JUDICIAL COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN arts. 197 & 184(3)---additional Judges of the High Court not confirmed as Permanent Judges (petitioners)---Constitutional petition filed by the petitioners against their non-confirmation---Maintainability---Petitioners failed to establish the primary condition for the maintainability of their petition, namely, that any Fundamental Right of theirs had been infringed---additional Judges are only appointed for such duration as the President determines subject to any period prescribed by law---Currently no such law exists therefore it is the President who decides the period for which a person performs the functions of an additional Judge---as a matter of convention such period is one year, at the end of which the (Judicial) Commission may either confirm an additional Judge or grant him/her an extension or allow his/her term of appointment to expire---Since the confirmation of additional Judges is contingent upon the approval of the Commission, it cannot be said that additional Judges possess a constitutional tenure---Petitioners being additional Judges cannot on the strength of the doctrine of independence of judiciary and/or access to justice claim a right to be confirmed as Permanent Judges of the High Court---any decision to the contrary will render article 197 of the Constitution redundant---Similarly, additional Judges cannot also claim an extension of their term because no Fundamental Right under the Constitution confers such entitlement upon them---When the (Judicial) Commission as a whole was not in favour of recommending the petitioners for an extension of their term, the latter could have no reasonable ground to entertain a legitimate expectation to be confirmed as Permanent Judges---Present Constitutional petitions were liable to be dismissed for being not maintainable.

Other judgments reported in 2023 PLD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English