PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

GOOD LUCK TRADERS vs The COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (APPEALS) Ss — 2023 PTD 793 CUSTOMS-APPELLATE-TRIBUNAL-LAHORE

Case information

Citation
2023 PTD 793 CUSTOMS-APPELLATE-TRIBUNAL-LAHORE
Court
Lahore High Court
Year
2023
Reporter
PTD
Parties
GOOD LUCK TRADERS vs The COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (APPEALS) Ss

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

GOOD LUCK TRADERS VS The COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (APPEALS) Ss. 32(1), 32(2), 25, 79, 209 & 156(1), Cls. 1, 14 & 45---SRO No.499(I)/2009 dated 13-06-2009---Mis-declaration---Examination---Redemption fine and penalty, imposition of---Discriminatory treatment---Scope---Appellant/importer declared imported goods as "old & used computers"---Contention of the appellant/importer was that the redemption fine and penalty had been imposed only on the apprehension that the importer had deliberately committed mis-declaration of contents of the consignments in order to avoid payment of due amount of leviable duty and taxes---Held, that that there was absolutely no likelihood of escape of leviable duty and taxes on imported consignments of used computers as the same were invariably marked for 100 percent examination---Examination report of such consignments reflected the composition of imported goods accurately, thus making it almost impossible to evade leviable duties and taxes on such imports unless there was some oversight by the Examination Staff of the Collectorate---Such consignments , however, consisted of mixed lot purchased from abroad and it was not possible for the importers to make correct declaration of all the contents of such consignments at the time of declaration before the Department---Any mistake in the declaration was, therefore, not intentional on the part of importers of such goods by any means---Record revealed that previously the Department had released identical goods of other importers, thus discriminatory treatment with the appellant / importer was unfair---Imposition of fine and penalty, in the present case, was too harsh and thus was not applicable as no element of Mens Rea was established against the appellant/importer---Fine and penalty imposed was cancelled/waived---Order-in-Original and Order-in Appeal were set aside---Appeal was allowed, under circumstances. Head NotesCase Description

Other judgments reported in 2023 PTD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English