FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, ISLAMABAD vs Dr — 2023 SCMR 848 SUPREME-COURT

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, ISLAMABAD VS Dr. SHAHID HANIF R. 12---S.R.O. No. 1138(I)/2014, dated 17.12.2014, published in the Extraordinary Gazette of Pakistan on 23.12.2014, R. 4 & Sched.---Serial 5.2, Estacode, Edition 2015---Serial No. 12, Page 1245, Estacode Edition 2007---Post of Executive Director (BS-21) in the Federal Government Polyclinic (PGMI)---Experience required for post---Post-qualification experience---Scope---Corresponding to General Instructions of the Federal Public Service Commission, the post qualification experience as mentioned in Rule 12 of the Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1973, means experience gained in regular full-time paid job, including experience of daily wages, contingent services and that of the on job training, subject to its relevancy acquired after attaining the requisite minimum advertised qualification---Genus of Post qualification experience deduces the experience and proficiency which is gained after achieving the specific degree/education in order to meet the qualifying standards for the selected vacancy or job with the characteristics and attributes of ability, suitability and fitness of a person to perform a particular job or task with excellence---In fact it depends on the fine sense of judgment of requisitioning authority to structure the yardstick of required qualification for the post and no relaxation can be claimed in the criteria fixed for the post qualification experience---Experience for the post in question in the present case meant experience gained in a regular full time paid job after obtaining the required qualification---Appeal was allowed, the impugned judgment of the High Court was set aside, and the recruiting authority was directed to re-advertise the post.

FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, ISLAMABAD vs Dr — 2023 SCMR 848 SUPREME-COURT

Case information

Judgment text as reported

Other judgments reported in 2023 SCMR