PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

DAD MUHAMMAD vs State Ss — 2023 YLR 1595 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN

Case information

Citation
2023 YLR 1595 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN
Court
Balochistan High Court
Year
2023
Reporter
YLR
Parties
DAD MUHAMMAD vs State Ss
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
S. 161

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

DAD MUHAMMAD VS State Ss. 302(b), 324, 147 & 149---Qatl-i-amd, attempt to commit qatl-i-amd, rioting, unlawful assembly---Appreciation of evidence---Benefit of doubt---Delay in recording statements of witnesses---Effect---Accused were charged for committing murder of the complainant's brother and nephews and a labourer due to previous enmity---Record showed that the statement under S. 161, Cr.P.C., of injured witness was recorded after a delay of four months from the occurrence---Statements under S. 161, Cr.P.C. of eye-witnesses were recorded after a delay of ten days after the occurrence---Prosecution had failed to furnish any plausible explanation in that regard---Said aspect of the case rendered the case of the prosecution extremely doubtful---Said witnesses remained mum for a long time and recorded their statements under S. 161, Cr.P.C. with considerable delay---Delay of even one or two days without explanation in recording the statements of witnesses had been found fatal for the prosecution---Circumstances established that the prosecution had failed to prove its case against the accused beyond any shadow of doubt---Appeal against conviction was allowed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2023 YLR

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English