PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

AMJAD HUSSAIN vs ZAFAR JANG S — 2023 YLR 168 Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court

Case information

Citation
2023 YLR 168 Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court
Year
2023
Reporter
YLR
Parties
AMJAD HUSSAIN vs ZAFAR JANG S
Provisions referred to
S. 9---; S. 34---C; S. 115---R

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

AMJAD HUSSAIN VS ZAFAR JANG S. 9---arbitration act (X of 1940), S.34---Civil Court to try all suits unless barred---Power to stay legal proceedings where there is an arbitration clause---Scope---Plaintiff assailed the rejection of his plaint as well as dismissal of his appeal--- Validity--- Plaintiff and defendants had entered into an agreement and the plaintiff had got sub-distributorship from defendants since 2012--- Sub-distributorship agreement between the plaintiff and defendants was accepted by both the parties and they had admitted the existence of arbitration clause in the agreement---In the light of the arbitration clause the impugned orders of courts below had been passed on the basis of correct appreciation of relevant law---Findings of the fact/law recorded concurrently by the courts below usually could not be interfered/ upset by the High Court in its revisional jurisdiction---Revision petition was dismissed. Head NotesCase Description Citation Name: 2023 YLR 168 Gilgit-Baltistan Chief CourtBookmark this Case AMJAD HUSSAIN VS ZAFAR JANG S.115---Revision petition---Concurrent findings---Scope---Findings of the fact/law recorded concurrently by the courts below usually cannot be interfered/upset by the High Court in its revisional jurisdiction. Head NotesCase Description

Other judgments reported in 2023 YLR

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English