PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Citation Name: 2023 YLR 2261 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURTBookmark this Case Mst. KHADIJA vs The CONTROLLING AUTHORITY BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION/ CHIEF MINISTER KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA, PESHAWAR art — 2023 YLR 2261 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT

Case information

Citation
2023 YLR 2261 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT
Court
Peshawar High Court
Year
2023
Reporter
YLR
Parties
Citation Name: 2023 YLR 2261 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURTBookmark this Case Mst. KHADIJA vs The CONTROLLING AUTHORITY BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION/ CHIEF MINISTER KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA, PESHAWAR art
Subject matter
Constitutional

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Citation Name: 2023 YLR 2261 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURTBookmark this Case Mst. KHADIJA VS The CONTROLLING AUTHORITY BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION/ CHIEF MINISTER KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA, PESHAWAR art. 199---Educational institution---Constitution of Examination Centers---Educational institution as an examination centre, declaration of---Constitutional petition---Maintainability---Petitioners (owners of an educational institution) were desirous that their educational institution be constituted as an examination center, but their request, in said regard, made at Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education ('the Board') was declined---Petitioners invoked constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court praying for the passing of directions to the Respondents/Board to constitute their educational institution as an examination center---Contention of the petitioners was that the examination centre made by the Board at another village were at a long distance and would create problems for the students of locality especially for female students---Held, that as per the relevant the rules of Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education ('the Rules') , the declaration of examination hall was a privilege of the Chairman of the Board---application having been submitted to the Controller of the Board by the petitioners revealed that they had mentioned total 99 students of both IX and X Classes without mentioning the number of the female students ;and they did not assert that those students would suffer in case of going to the examination center in the school of another village---Total numbers of students, in the present case, did not appear to meet the target mentioned in R. 1(2) of the relevant Rules---Petitioners had not presented any documentary proof to show that earlier their institution had been declared as centre for the examination---High Court should not interfere in the internal governance of an educational institution and the constitution of an examination hall was the function of the respondents/ authorities having the expertise, in such regard---Constitutional petition was dismissed in limine, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2023 YLR

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English