PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Citation Name: 2023 YLR 250 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREBookmark this Case ABDUL JABBAR vs State S — 2023 YLR 250 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Citation
2023 YLR 250 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
Court
Lahore High Court
Year
2023
Reporter
YLR
Parties
Citation Name: 2023 YLR 250 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREBookmark this Case ABDUL JABBAR vs State S
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
S. 345---P; S. 420---D; S. 345; S. 420; Penal Code (XLV of 1860)

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Citation Name: 2023 YLR 250 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREBookmark this Case ABDUL JABBAR VS State S. 345---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 420---Dishonestly inducing delivery of property---Compounding the offence---Scope---Perusal of S. 345, Cr.P.C. reveals that offence under S. 420, P.P.C. can be compounded with the permission of Court by "the person cheated". Citation Name: 2023 YLR 250 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREBookmark this Case ABDUL JABBAR VS State Compromise--- Scope--- Partial compromise cannot be taken into consideration for acquittal. Citation Name: 2023 YLR 250 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREBookmark this Case ABDUL JABBAR VS State S. 420---Dishonestly inducing delivery of property---appreciation of evidence---Benefit of doubt---Scope---accused persons were alleged to have made a (Charitable) institution for paying Rs.50000/- for the daughters' marriage, for children school fee and for medical treatment but for obtaining said amount an amount of Rs.15000/- had to be deposited as advance; when complainant and others asked for payment of promised amount, they were issued "Form" and told that the institution's team would come and deliver the amount at home, however, subsequently nothing was paid to affectees---Validity---No receipt containing signatures of accused persons showing receiving of alleged amount from any affected person was produced by the prosecution---"Form" issued to the complainant was not produced---Publications/advertisements as well as letter/form containing "Congratulations" were produced by the complainant to police and not recovered from possession of accused persons---When receiving of any amount/valuable security/property or anything by the accused persons through cheating and dishonest inducement from the complainant or anyone else had not been proved then basic ingredients constituting offence under S. 420, P.P.C. were missing in the case---Prosecution had failed to prove charge under S. 420, P.P.C.---Criminal revision was accepted and the accused persons were acquitted of the charge, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2023 YLR

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English