PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Citation Name: 2023 YLR 729 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREBookmark this Case KHADIM HUSSAIN vs ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, LAYYAH S — 2023 YLR 729 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Citation
2023 YLR 729 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
Court
Lahore High Court
Year
2023
Reporter
YLR
Parties
Citation Name: 2023 YLR 729 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREBookmark this Case KHADIM HUSSAIN vs ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, LAYYAH S
Subject matter
Constitutional
Provisions referred to
S. 2; S. 6---; Punjab Rented Premises Act

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Citation Name: 2023 YLR 729 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREBookmark this Case KHADIM HUSSAIN VS ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, LAYYAH S. 2(m)---Oral tenancy---Rented premises must be rented out through a written tenancy agreement, however, an oral tenancy has not been barred under Punjab Rented Premises Act, 2009. Citation Name: 2023 YLR 729 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREBookmark this Case KHADIM HUSSAIN VS ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, LAYYAH Ss. 2(m), 6 & 19---Landlord and tenant, relationship---Oral tenancy agreement--- Proof--- Petitioner was aggrieved of eviction order passed by Lower Appellate Court---Validity---In order for an eviction petition to succeed and exercise of jurisdiction by Rent Tribunal under Punjab Rented Premises Act, 2009, it was necessary that respondents were to establish their own case independent of failure of petitioner to successfully challenge their title---Respondents asserted a particular fact regarding existence of relationship of tenancy between the parties on the basis of an oral agreement and was under obligation to prove the same---Witness of respondents contradicted their stance while being cross-examined, therefore, case of respondents squarely fell within the purview of maxim "Allegans Contraria Non Est Audiendus" (A person who alleges things contradictory to each other is not to be heard)---Settlement of rent was one of the basic requirements for establishing landlord-tenant relationship and in absence of the same, there could not be an oral tenancy---Where settlement of rent was not alleged in eviction petition and thereafter not proved, an eviction petitioner could not succeed merely on the ground of presumption that an eviction petitioner was owner of rented premises was also the landlord---There were other remedies available under the law to owner of such an immovable property to have unlawful occupant or a trespasser who was not a tenant, evicted from such property, which the respondents could avail---Findings rendered in eviction proceedings could not confer any title upon petitioner qua the rented premises---High Court in exercise of constitutional jurisdiction, set aside order passed by Lower Appellate Court and restored that of Rent Tribunal declining to evict petitioner form the premises---Constitutional petition was allowed in circumstances. Citation Name: 2023 YLR 729 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREBookmark this Case KHADIM HUSSAIN VS ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, LAYYAH S. 6--- Tenancy agreement---Relationship of landlord and tenant---Proof---Payment and receipt of rent is sine qua non for establishing relationship of tenancy between the parties.

Other judgments reported in 2023 YLR

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English