PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

WAJID vs State S — 2023 YLRN 60 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Case information

Citation
2023 YLRN 60 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH
Court
Sindh High Court
Year
2023
Parties
WAJID vs State S
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
S. 497---P; S. 161; Penal Code (XLV of 1860)

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

WAJID VS State S. 497---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 337, 377-B & 34---Unnatural offence, sexual abuse, common intention---Bail, refusal of---Admittedly, the name of the accused transpired in the FIR with specific role as he with the help of his brother was found committing sodomy with minor boy aged about 14 years, who was found bleeding from rectum---Witnesses had supported the case and medical evidence supported the prosecution version also circumstantial evidence collected in shape of blood-stained clothes of victim---First Information Report had been lodged promptly---Witnesses in their statements under S.161, Cr.P.C. had fully supported the version of complainant and the medical evidence also corroborated the version of complainant---Investigating Officer had collected the blood stained clothes, who also prepared mashirnama of blood stained clothes of victim and clothes of accused, mashirnama of place of vardat, mashirnama of arrest---Victim had also been admitted in hospital for checkup and during the checkup doctor found that the blood was oozing and victim was feeling pain, tear was present over anal examination, anus was partly closed---Bail application had been moved solely on the ground that DNA test report did not match---Such like reports were only corroborative in nature and were required only when ocular testimony was of a doubtful character---No reason could be offered as to why the victim, who had been subjected to sexual inter course, would have spared the actual offender and should have instead substituted the accused for him---Prima facie and for the purpose of bail petition, it could not be said that the testimony offered by the victim could admit of any doubt---Accused had not made out his case for grant of post arrest bail---Bail application was dismissed, in circumstances.

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English