PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

SUI NORTHERN GAS PIPELINES LTD. vs WAFAQI MOHTASIB Preamble — 2024 CLC 1787 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Citation
2024 CLC 1787 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
Court
Lahore High Court
Year
2024
Reporter
CLC
Parties
SUI NORTHERN GAS PIPELINES LTD. vs WAFAQI MOHTASIB Preamble
Subject matter
Criminal

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

SUI NORTHERN GAS PIPELINES LTD. VS WAFAQI MOHTASIB Preamble---Object, purpose and scope---Preamble to a statute is not operational part of enactment but it is a gateway, which discusses purpose and intent of the Legislature to necessitate legislation on the subject---Preamble also sheds clear light on goals that the Legislator aims to secure through introduction of such law---Preamble of a statute holds a pivotal role for the purposes of interpretation in order to dissect true purpose and intent of law. Citation Name: 2024 CLC 1787 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE SUI NORTHERN GAS PIPELINES LTD. VS WAFAQI MOHTASIB arts.2(1), 3 & 9---Constitution of Pakistan, art. 199---Constitutional petition---Mal-administration---Gas connection, providing of---Payment of urgent fee before cutoff date---Petitioner / Sui Northern Gas Pipeline Company was aggrieved of direction issued by Ombudsman to provide gas connection to respondent / complainant---Validity---Matter agitated in complaint was related to non-provision of new gas connection which was denied by petitioner company---Such action of petitioner company as "agency" was in terms of art. 2(1) of Establishment of the Office of Wafaqi Mohtasib (Ombudsman) Order, 1983---Order in question was unreasonable, unjust, oppressive and arbitrary, which amounted to mal-administration falling within the ambit of art. 9 of Establishment of the Office of Wafaqi Mohtasib (Ombudsman) Order, 1983 for the purpose of exercise of jurisdiction by Ombudsman in the matter to undo act of administrative excess---Ombudsman rightly observed that respondent / complainant should not be penalized of such a ban where he had paid Urgent Fee before cutoff date---High Court declined to interfere in order passed by Ombudsman as the same did not suffer from any legal infirmity or jurisdictional defect---Constitutional petition was dismissed in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2024 CLC

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English