PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

MUSHTAQ AHMED vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Religious Affairs and Interfaith Harmony, Islamabad art — 2024 CLC 1917 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Case information

Citation
2024 CLC 1917 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH
Court
Sindh High Court
Year
2024
Reporter
CLC
Parties
MUSHTAQ AHMED vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Religious Affairs and Interfaith Harmony, Islamabad art
Subject matter
Civil
Provisions referred to
S. 9; S. 11; Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

MUSHTAQ AHMED VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Religious Affairs and Interfaith Harmony, Islamabad art.199---Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), art.114---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O.II R.2---Constitutional jurisdiction of High Court---Scope---alternate remedy, availing of---Principles of exhaustion and election of remedy---Scope---Principles of estoppel and res judicata, applicability of---Issuance of notice on account of default in payment of rent of shops purchased by petitioner---Upon filing a suit, injunctive order was passed by Civil Court---Contention of the petitioner was that respondents were trying to dispossess the petitioner from the shops, therefore, he sought implementation of injunctive order of Civil Court through constitutional petition---Validity---If petitioner was dispossessed from the subject property, then he might have filed a contempt petition before the Court that had passed the restraining order, or a suit under S.9 of the Specific Relief act, 1877, instead of filing a constitutional petition under art.199 of the Constitution---Principle of exhaustion is not merely a procedural formality but a mandatory rule of jurisdictive prudence, which falls under art.199 of the Constitution---Once an election is made and a judicial path is chosen a litigant is precluded from initiating subsequent proceedings to seek relief or remedy that contradicts the claims or remedies that could have been pursued through the initial action---Such principle is known in jurisprudence as the 'Doctrine of Election', which is extrapolated from the established legal tenets of waiver or the voluntary relinquishment of a known right, claim, privilege or relief, as encapsulated in O.II, R.2, C.P.C., the doctrine of estoppel as enshrined in art.114 of the Qanun-e Shahadat, 1984, and the doctrine of res judicata as enunciated in S.11, C.P.C. and its accompanying explanations---Constitutional petition was dismissed accordingly.

Other judgments reported in 2024 CLC

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English