PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

The DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BAJAUR vs Mst — 2024 CLC 64 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT

Case information

Citation
2024 CLC 64 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT
Court
Peshawar High Court
Year
2024
Reporter
CLC
Parties
The DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BAJAUR vs Mst
Subject matter
Civil

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

The DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BAJAUR VS Mst. MAHI SULTAN Ss.7(5) & 11---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199---Allotment of Government accommodation---Removal of encroachments and eviction of unauthorized occupant---Scope---Allotted quarter was cancelled from the name of the respondent---Being aggrieved, she filed a declaratory suit with permanent and mandatory injunction against the Deputy Commissioner---Interim injunction was issued in favour of the respondent---Validity---Record was suggestive of the fact that suit was filed on 24.12.2022 whereas the allotment in favour of respondent/plaintiff was cancelled by the Deputy Commissioner vide order dated 13.12.2022 and as such, the date on which the suit was filed, the respondent/plaintiff was not the legal allottee of the disputed quarter---Impugned order dated 13.01.2023 was passed on the application of the respondent/plaintiff, whereby she had sought restoration of possession of the quarter in question on the plea that there was an interim injunction order in her favour---For grant of an injunction either perpetual or temporary and for that matter mandatory, the co-existence of three essential ingredients was sine qua non---Respondent/ plaintiff must place before the Court a prima facie case pertaining to her legal rights, character/status---When the allotment had been cancelled earlier to the institution of the suit then the respondent/ plaintiff even on the date of filing of the suit had no prima facie case in her favour rather it required recording of evidence, if at all, to be resolved, in favour of the respondent/plaintiff and in absence of one of the ingredient i.e., prima facie case, the other ingredients i.e., balance of convenience and irreparable loss lost its significance---Petition was allowed by setting aside the impugned order, in circumstance.

Other judgments reported in 2024 CLC

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English