PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

ALI WAQAR AZEEM vs STANDARD CHARTERED BANK PAKISTAN LIMITED Ss — 2024 CLD 397 ISLAMABAD

Case information

Citation
2024 CLD 397 ISLAMABAD
Court
Islamabad High Court
Year
2024
Reporter
CLD
Parties
ALI WAQAR AZEEM vs STANDARD CHARTERED BANK PAKISTAN LIMITED Ss
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
S. 10

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

ALI WAQAR AZEEM VS STANDARD CHARTERED BANK PAKISTAN LIMITED Ss. 9, 10 & 22---Suit for recovery of finance---Leave to defend the suit---Limitation, non-consideration of---Effect---Application for leave to defend the suit filed by appellant/defendant was dismissed due to non-prosecution resultantly Banking Court decreed the suit in favour of respondent/plaintiff---Validity---It was not mandatory for Banking Court to decree the suit in favour of respondent/plaintiff upon default of appellant/defendant due to his absence---Even if appellant/defendant failed to file application for leave to defend or had failed to file it in a timely manner leading to its dismissal unless delay was condoned, it was bounden duty of Banking Court to apply its mind to see if respondent/plaintiff had made out a case for decree of the matter---Appellant/defendant's leave application was dismissed by Banking Court simply on account of non-prosecution without considering whether any substantial question of law or fact had arisen therefrom---Banking Court failed to discharge its duty under the law and had adopted procedure alien to the one envisaged in S. 10 of Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001---It was the Banking Court which while considering petition for leave to appear and defend the suit should have considered and rendered its findings as to whether it was timely filed---High Court in appellate jurisdiction declined to determine whether petition for leave to appear and defend the suit was time barred or not, as Banking Court failed to consider petition filed by appellant/defendant---High Court set aside judgment and decree passed by Banking Court as it suffered from legal infirmity and the matter was remanded to Banking Court to decide petition for leave to appear and defend the suit afresh---Appeal was allowed accordingly.

Other judgments reported in 2024 CLD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English