PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

MCB BANK LIMITED vs PROVINCE OF PUNJAB S — 2024 CLD 418 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Citation
2024 CLD 418 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
Court
Lahore High Court
Year
2024
Reporter
CLD
Parties
MCB BANK LIMITED vs PROVINCE OF PUNJAB S
Subject matter
Constitutional
Provisions referred to
S. 22; S. 12; Horticulture Authority Act (XLVII of 2012)

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

MCB BANK LIMITED VS PROVINCE OF PUNJAB S. 22(a)---Parks and Horticulture Authority Act (XLVII of 2012), S.12(8)---Financial institutions and other companies Bill boards and sign boards---Charging of fee---Petitioner companies were aggrieved of notice of demand issued by respondent Authority to recover fee for installing their bill boards, sky boards and advertisements---Validity---Notices in question delivered to petitioners by Parks and Horticulture Authority did not contain specific particulars regarding nature of product which was advertised and the date, time and place it was installed/erected---Such generic notices were vague and simply mentioned various categories of outdoor advertisements directing petitioners to pay fee---Due process requirements would be fulfilled after it had afforded opportunity to petitioners to respond to such notices by taking any and all objections available to them for assailed levy of advertisement fee---High Court set aside notices issued to petitioner companies and High Court directed Parks and Horticulture Authority that if fresh notices were to be issued, directions given by High Court in W.P. No. 208309 of 2018 titled Meezan Bank Limited and others v. The Province of Punjab should be followed---Constitutional petition was allowed accordingly.

Other judgments reported in 2024 CLD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English