PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Muhammad Yousuf Barakzai vs Ms — 2024 MLD 1829 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Case information

Citation
2024 MLD 1829 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH
Court
Sindh High Court
Year
2024
Reporter
MLD
Parties
Muhammad Yousuf Barakzai vs Ms
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
Limitation Act (IX of 1908)

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Muhammad Yousuf Barakzai VS Ms. Gulnar Ss. 42 & 54--- Limitation Act (IX of 1908), First Sched., Art. 91--- Suit for declaration and injunction--- Benami transaction--- Proof--- Limitation--- Parties were husband and wife and their relationship ended in a divorce--- Respondent / plaintiff claimed to be owner of suit property on the plea that she had purchased it from her own sources--- Suit filed by respondent / plaintiff was decreed in her favour by Trial Court--- Appellant / defendant contended that he was actual owner in possession of suit property and suit filed by respondent / plaintiff was barred by limitation---Validity---Entire chain of title documents and other related documents were in possession of appellant / defendant who was the actual seller of suit property--- Deal to sell suit property was also transacted between appellant / defendant and husband of the seller but for reasons known to them they both chose to have their respective spouses in the front--- Respondent / plaintiff might have been aware that appellant / defendant surreptitiously transferred the property in his name but the couple was happily married at the time of purchase--- Parties had a few children, both before and after the event---Respondent / plaintiff not insisting at that point in time to have the conveyance deed cancelled to the extent of 50% share was understandable--- It was when appellant / defendant denied her the right to access and enjoy the property that the cause of action arose--- Suit was not barred by limitation--- Suit property was bought by appellant / defendant from his own money, who was owner of the apartment whereas respondent / plaintiff was only shown as an ostensible owner in terms of sale agreement/power of attorney--- Appellant / defendant also bought another property with his funds and had the original title documents with him--- Respondent / plaintiff failed to produce meaningful evidence in support of her case--- Appeal was allowed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2024 MLD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English