PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Citation Name: 2024 PCrLJ 105 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANBookmark this Case BABAR ALI vs MUHAMMAD IQBAL Ss — 2024 PCrLJ 105 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN

Case information

Citation
2024 PCrLJ 105 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN
Court
Balochistan High Court
Year
2024
Reporter
PCRLJ
Parties
Citation Name: 2024 PCrLJ 105 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANBookmark this Case BABAR ALI vs MUHAMMAD IQBAL Ss
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
S. 417; Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Citation Name: 2024 PCrLJ 105 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANBookmark this Case BABAR ALI VS MUHAMMAD IQBAL Ss. 324, 427 & 34---Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 417(2-A)---Attempt to commit qatl-i-amd, mischief causing damage to the amount of fifty rupees, common intention---Appreciation of evidence---Appeal against acquittal---Benefit of doubt---Identification of accused before the police---Accused were charged for firing upon complainant party, due to which brother and cousin of the complainant got injured---Record showed that the complainant along with injured persons identified the accused at the police station and submitted affidavits before the Officer In-charge, Police Station---In affidavits, the complainant and injured persons mentioned that the accused along with his co-accused had made firing at them---Application made by the complainant for registration of FIR did not contain description of the physical features of the accused persons and the absconding accused---Identification, merely at police station without holding identification parade was of no legal value---Complainant and the injured persons had not mentioned that the accused persons were previously known to them---Hence, identification of an accused at police station, that too, after eleven days of the incident, was of no use and the Trial Court vide impugned judgment had rightly discarded that piece of evidence---Circumstances established that the prosecution failed to prove its case against the accused beyond reasonable shadow of doubt---Appeal against acquittal was accordingly dismissed.

Other judgments reported in 2024 PCRLJ

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English